As the world watched with bated breath, King Charles III’s ascent to the British throne sparked a resurgence of unease surrounding the name that history had deemed cursed. From the outset, murmurs of skepticism echoed through the hallowed halls of Buckingham Palace, stirring memories of the ill-fated monarchs who bore the name before him.
Foremost among these tragic figures was Charles I, whose reign became synonymous with turmoil and strife. A staunch believer in the divine right of kings, Charles I clashed with Parliament in a bitter power struggle that culminated in the outbreak of the English Civil Wars. Despite his conviction and resolve, Charles I ultimately met his demise on the executioner’s block, a stark testament to the perils of absolute monarchy.
Yet, if Charles I’s reign was marked by conflict and chaos, his son’s tenure offered little respite from misfortune. Charles II, known colloquially as the “Merry Monarch,” presided over a kingdom plagued by pestilence and fire. The ravages of the Great Plague and the cataclysmic Great Fire of London cast a dark shadow over his rule, leaving a legacy tinged with tragedy and loss.
The Charles from France
Across the English Channel, Charles X of France faced a similar fate, his unwavering commitment to absolutism sparking widespread discontent and rebellion. Faced with mounting opposition from liberal and radical factions, Charles X was ultimately forced to abdicate the throne and seek refuge in exile, his dreams of royal supremacy shattered in the face of popular revolt.
Meanwhile, in the sun-scorched lands of Spain, Charles II’s reign unfolded as a grim testament to the perils of royal inbreeding. Afflicted by a litany of physical ailments and beset by ill health from birth, Charles II’s rule was marred by suffering and uncertainty. His death, devoid of heirs, plunged Spain into a bitter succession crisis, ushering in an era of turmoil and strife.
Yet, amidst the echoes of past tragedies, a question lingered: was it truly the name that cursed these monarchs, or the weight of history’s expectations bearing down upon their shoulders? As King Charles III is now ruling over England, only time would tell if he could defy the specter of misfortune that had haunted his predecessors for centuries.
And as unfortunate as the Royal Charles seems to be, the King of England is struck by cancer. Buckingham Palace announced in February that King Charles III had been diagnosed with cancer. Although the condition was identified during an operation that treated the British monarch’s benign prostate enlargement, but no one knows if it is really prostrate cancer.
Cover Photo:
Source: Tatler
Harry Potter’s JK Rowling to be arrested in lieu of “misgendering” trans women?