Sunday, May 25, 2025
16.1 C
London

Parents illegally harvest dead son’s sperm to create “designer grandson”

- Advertisement -

A mere three days after their only child’s sudden death, a wealthy British couple illegally harvested his sperm in order to create a “designer grandson”.

The couple’s actions contravene laws in the United Kingdom, where no person can extract another person’s semen without written consent even posthumously, under the Human Fertilization and Embryology Act 1990.

To get around this, the couple extracted their son’s semen and sent it to a fertility expert in the US who created a “designer grandson” for the pair using a surrogate and donor eggs. Working remotely from his IVF clinic in La Jolla, California, Dr. David Smotrich told UK publication The Mail that it was a “privilege” to help the couple whose son was unmarried and had no children:

“The English couple lost their son under the most tragic of circumstances. They desperately wanted an heir and a grandchild. It was a privilege to be able to help them.”

- Advertisement -

55-year-old Dr Smotrich has made headlines over the decades for breaking ethical barriers. The Metro reports that he “created the first test-tube baby for a same-sex US couple in 1997, and previously helped Berkshire-based businessman Ian Mucklejohn become Britain’s first single dad of triplets in 2001.”

Dr Smotrich told reporters: “Producing a child using posthumous sperm is exceedingly rare. I have done it only five times. This couple were desperate to find someone who would be able to create an heir. They wanted a boy. What we did is not available in the UK, where gender-selection isn’t legal.”

According to the Metro, “The boy, now three, is understood to be living in the UK with his grandparents in what is believed to be the first case of its kind in the UK.”

Legal experts, however, say that the grandparents could face criminal charges for violating UK laws. Former chairman of the British Fertility Society, Professor Allan Pacey said:

- Advertisement -

“If the patient, in this case, wasn’t being treated by a clinic, and had not signed the necessary consent forms for the posthumous retrieval, storage and use of his sperm, then a criminal act has probably taken place.

“The clinician who extracted the sperm is in breach of the law as is the facility which stored and exported the sample.”

- Advertisement -

Hot this week

Kate Middleton expecting twins, according to reports

According to news on the Internet, the Duchess of...

Is BTS’s Taehyung colour blind?

The rumour mill online has been speculating that Korean...

Hurley wore ‘the dress’ after being snubbed by top fashion designers

Model Liz Hurley became famous after wearing "the dress"...

Hyun Bin taking legal action against rumours involving Son Ye Jin

While the hottest K-drama screening on-air is undoubtedly Crash...

HK protesters call for boycott of Ip Man 4: The Finale

Hong Kong -- The final instalment of the Ip...

Dynasty or Democracy? Nurul Izzah’s Comeback Sparks Uproar in PKR as Rafizi Cries Foul

Anwar Ibrahim is renowned for his out-of-the-box thinking, which...

ChatGPT at two — and OpenAI’s vision for the future

Two years after OpenAI launched ChatGPT, the groundbreaking AI...

Vertical Institute Unveils Generative AI Course to Meet Growing Demand for Digital Proficiency

The future of work is undeniably intertwined with artificial...

Jimmy Carter: The Nobel US president who lived to be 100

Jimmy Carter, the peanut farmer who became the 39th...

Manmohan Singh: The leader who transformed India

Manmohan Singh's story is one of remarkable transformation, both...

Why AI ‘hallucinates’: What’s missing in the models

The American writer Richard Powers' latest novel, Playground, delves...

Challenging job market diminishes appeal of postgraduate studies in China

China is seeing a significant decline in postgraduate entrance...

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_img