Home International suffers legal blow in EU court over

Facebook suffers legal blow in EU court over hate speech

The complaint also concerned messages from fictitious accounts, which according to the Greens, had called Glawischnig-Piesczek a "corrupt" person

Author

Date

Category

- Advertisement -

on Wednesday was dealt a major blow in the EU’s top court, which ruled that national courts in can order online platforms to remove defamatory content worldwide.

The decision will be seen as a victory for EU regulators, are ambitious to see tech giants meet tightened European standards over hate speech and offensive content.

Last week, the same court decided that Google was not legally compelled to apply the EU’s strict “right to be forgotten” rules globally, in a victory for the search giant.

In a closely watched judgment, the European Court of Justice said EU “does not preclude” courts from ordering “the removal of information or to block access worldwide,” a statement said.

- Advertisement -

The latest case was brought originally to an Austrian court by Greens party politician Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek, requested the removal of Facebook posts that the judges found defamed her and could be seen by users of the network around the .

The complaint also concerned messages from fictitious accounts, which according to the Greens, had called Glawischnig-Piesczek a “corrupt” person and which the social network refused to delete.

A higher Austrian court referred the case to the EU’s top court for an opinion and the judgment, which cannot be appealed, will now be used as a reference -wide.

With the decision, Facebook and similar platforms such as , face a greater obligation to monitor their content and take down content found to be offensive or hateful, even from fake accounts.

- Advertisement -

Facebook slammed the EU court’s decision, saying “ undermines the long-standing principle that one country does not have the right to impose its laws on speech on another country.”

also deplored the obligation to track down “equivalent” content that duplicates offensives or hateful language.

– ‘Chilling effect’ –
“In order to get this right, national courts will have to set out very clear definitions on what ‘identical’ and ‘equivalent’ means in practice,” a Facebook statement said

“We hope the courts take a proportionate and measured approach, to avoid having a chilling effect on of expression,” it said.

- Advertisement -

Glawischnig-Piesczek, the victim of the hate speech, hailed the decision as “a historic success for human rights against web giants”.

“It in no way infringes of opinion,” Glawischnig-Piesczek told the Austrian news agency APA.

EU-wide rules on hate speech are limited.

So far, online giants including Google’s Youtube, have agreed to voluntarily take down hateful or dangerous content, including those linked to terrorism, within 24 hours.

However, the EU is expected to propose tougher Europe-wide measures including fines if Facebook and others fail to comply with orders.

© Agence -Presse

- Advertisement -
Advertisement

Popular

YouTube
LinkedIn
LinkedIn
Share
Instagram