A tech hiring manager just told Reddit exactly why your resume is getting ignored, and it may not be because of what you're thinking
A post on Reddit from someone who runs hiring at a mid-sized tech company has cut through the noise of generic job search advice to offer something genuinely useful: a ground-level view of what a real hiring manager actually sees when they open your resume, and why most of them end up in the bin.
The original poster said the quality of applications has been wildly inconsistent lately, with half looking like unformatted blocks of AI-generated text, the other half like graphic design experiments that bury the actual work experience. Their advice is specific, practical, and comes from someone who is actively reading these all day.
Kill the professional summary. “Motivated and detail-oriented professional with a passion for synergy” is taking up the most valuable real estate on your resume and doing absolutely nothing for you. The hiring manager’s advice: skip it entirely. Go straight into your most recent experience or a tight, three-bullet core skills section. The person scanning your resume has seconds, so don’t waste them on a sentence they’ve read a thousand times before.
Metrics over duties. This is the one that most people get wrong. Writing “responsible for managing social media accounts” tells a hiring manager nothing. Writing “grew organic engagement by 35% in six months using targeted short-form video” tells them exactly what you did and how well you did it.
If you can’t put a percentage on it, use scale. “Managed budget across four departments” communicates scope even without a dollar figure. The principle is simple: don’t describe your job, describe your impact.
Match keywords, but don’t copy-paste them. Yes, ATS software is real and yes, keyword matching matters. But a human still reads the filtered list. If your resume reads like keyword soup, technically hitting every term in the job description but feeling robotic and hollow, it gets tossed in the ten-second scan. Probably immediately. The goal is to naturally reflect the language of the role without sounding like you ran the job posting through a thesaurus.
One page only, unless you have 10+ years of experience. Three years out of college and sending a three-page resume? It signals an inability to prioritise information, which is itself a relevant data point for a hiring manager. Unless you have a decade or more of genuinely relevant experience, fit it on one page. Editing ruthlessly is part of the job.
Why this matters right now
The advice lands differently in the context of a job market where hundreds of people are applying for every role and ATS software is filtering most of them out before a human ever looks. The hiring manager’s post is a useful reminder that the resume problem isn’t just volume, but it’s also that a lot of applications are optimised for the wrong thing. They’re written to get past the bot, not to be read by a person.
Enjoying this article?
Subscribe to get more stories like this delivered to your inbox.
The ten-second scan is real. The keyword filter is real. But so is the human on the other side who decides whether to click through. That person is reading for clarity, specificity, and evidence of actual results. A resume that gives them those three things quickly is one that stands out in a stack where most don’t.
For job seekers navigating the same hiring dynamic—that is, ATS filters, high application volumes, and the pressure to make an impression in seconds—the advice translates directly. The job market may be brutal, but a resume that leads with impact rather than description, fits on one page, and mirrors the role’s language naturally still does better than one that doesn’t.
Read also: ‘Not good’: Reddit’s verdict on the current US job market
Writer